We can play D&D on 4chan! Yay!

PhoneLobster · Post by **PhoneLobster** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:16 am

Sigma did the Feybook.

That wasn't a contribution. It's some sort of pseudo celtish fan wank.

And I demand nothing more than discussion of opinion. I just don't think a one of you lot is anything other than a fictionalised trolling identity that posts for anything but lulz. Hell one or two of you have admitted as much.

Yeah, forgot that he's referenced it before

No actually.

He mentions it occasionally when it is brought up. He doesn't identify himself as a channer, he isn't a defender of the place or its activities and he isn't a banner bearing poster boy.

Now if you want to name yourselves and your supposed achievements go crazy. But I can't address that kind of post without personally insulting each name on the list in turn, so in some attempt to not too greatly anger the local authorities I won't.

But frankly he should probably just move in early and lock this thread which I doubt was anything other than an underhanded trolling attempt anyway.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:29 pm

I don't see how any of this is relevant to the chaos that ensues upon trying a new feature, or ever 4chan itself.

You don't smarm someone about The O'Reilly Factor just because someone watches House, do you?

-Crissa

JonSetanta · Post by **JonSetanta** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:51 pm

Jerry wrote:
PhoneLobster wrote:Remind me the single actual contribution in your twenty two hundred posts?
Why do you need to "contribute?" Is offering your opinions on this message board enough?

P.S. Sigma did the Feybook.

Incorrect. It's a group project (also, current tense; it's still going as we try to wrap it up)

However, somewhere buried in the sludge of Ancientposting is some draft I sketched out before embarking on the Feybook project. I am still splitting it into seperate, usable sections, but thanks for mentioning.

Also, it was a pseudo Celtic fan wank. Right on.

I am a pain in the arse, I realize this, but as a whole far more interbuttians find me anywhere from benign to beneficial.
Subjects like these make me sad, if that's the right word for it. Maybe not sad but some mix of confusion and disappointment for about 60 seconds.

Jerry: You fit right in quickly. I'm admire your Tough Internet Skin.

Koumei: It's not really my problem. PL gives me lulz, I move on. Not like it affects past, present or future appreciation of his contributions, of which most are extended multiquote debates (I fail in the subject)

OK. Enough o this. Back to reading Bleach, Planetary, Transmetropolitan, and Hellboy, and begging for a new job.

Maxus · Post by **Maxus** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:12 pm

sigma999 wrote:
OK. Enough o this. Back to reading Bleach, Planetary, Transmetropolitan, and Hellboy, and begging for a new job.

Completely unrelated except to that parting sentence, but I'm so hard up for work I signed up to be a Sociology/Psychology test subject.

For, like, 10 dollars an hour.

JonSetanta · Post by **JonSetanta** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:22 am

Maxus wrote: Completely unrelated except to that parting sentence, but I'm so hard up for work I signed up to be a Sociology/Psychology test subject.

For, like, 10 dollars an hour.

Cool deal. I'd do that too but I'm an "alumnus", not a student.

A friend did 2 shots of some morphine compound testing for Johns Hopkins or some local medical center (chances are it's Hopkins if in Baltimore) but went through the same bullshit withdraw symptoms I did a year ago. She might have been even worse off, given her semi-bipolar tendencies.
Protip: don't do drug testing for anyone, even if they pay you $1000. Ever.

Jerry · Post by **Jerry** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:59 am

sigma999 wrote: Jerry: You fit right in quickly. I'm admire your Tough Internet Skin.

I don't think that not caring enough is something to be admired.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:36 am

sigma999 wrote: Protip: don't do drug testing for anyone, even if they pay you $1000. Ever.

If it was morphine (or any other narcotic) I'd do it, with a stipulation of "If I start to suffer from withdrawal, you get to foot the bill for putting me on the methadone program (or providing more of their drug) for the rest of my life."

I mean, I could really do with a thousand dollars, and the added benefit of not being in pain would be fantastic as well. Just, I'm notoriously bad at dealing with withdrawal - even for sugar.

Jerry · Post by **Jerry** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:12 am

The 13 Wise Buttlords wrote: You're on a channel that encourages internet trolling and child pornography; these two things are indeed some of the darkest, sickest things about the Internet.

I don't find trolling dark and sick so much as annoying; when you encounter a user named "suckmynutz," it's your fault if you take him seriously.

JonSetanta · Post by **JonSetanta** » Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:27 am

Jerry wrote:I don't think that not caring enough is something to be admired.

Well, it's something I personally strive for.

Jerry · Post by **Jerry** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:15 am

sigma999 wrote:Well, it's something I personally strive for.

Just don't get offended by what some goon says to you on Myspace/chat room/message board. That's all you need to do. That, and not care.

JonSetanta · Post by **JonSetanta** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:38 am

Jerry wrote:
sigma999 wrote:Well, it's something I personally strive for.
Just don't get offended by what some goon says to you on Myspace/chat room/message board. That's all you need to do. That, and not care.

No, no, no.. it's more like when you put hours of effort in to writing and it's either ignored or blasted.
Not Feybook, exactly (we'll see how that fares when it's wrapped up and put on PDF), but just in general. I mean, quality writing is something most of us care about here, right? We wouldn't be on a forum with names if we didn't become attached to our works in some way or another.

Jerry · Post by **Jerry** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:14 am

sigma999 wrote:No, no, no.. it's more like when you put hours of effort in to writing and it's either ignored or blasted.

Being on this board, you should be used to this stuff by now.

Angry_Pessimist · Post by **Angry_Pessimist** » Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:42 pm

PhoneLobster wrote:That wasn't a contribution. It's some sort of pseudo celtish fan wank.

If it's a pseudo celtish fan wank that has good rules, that's fine with me.

And most D&D books consist of Cleric/Druid/Wizard fanwankery.